Category Archives: Editorial

Hey Twitter! #FIXIT

Can’t Join the Conversation

Twitter recently took away the option to see replies that people we don’t follow made in conversations.

This truly has broken the system that was making Twitter a joy for many of us. We often found new connections and new people to follow because we would find them engaged in conversation. In a sense, eavesdropping grew the community.

Twitter has not even given us the option to open this channel. They’ve simply taken it away altogether. Now we can only see the replies of others to people that we follow — but no one else.

FIXIT Twitter

I have seen quite a bit of action on this particular topic (obviously by people that I follow).

@ikepigott spearheaded a campaign tonight that has been filtering quite often in the “retweet” stream:

@twitter – The Replies were not broken. You’ve made conversational discovery impossible. #FIXIT (and retweet)

If you agree that this is a function that is debilitating to your Twitter useage, get on your stream and let them have it! #FIXIT

And you can quote me on that. I’m @richpalmer.


We’ll Miss You, Jamie

Good friend and former band-mate, Jamie Faulkner passed away early this morning. He was a fantastic man; a man of faith; a man of ethics and conviction. I know that he touched many lives and that he will be missed by so many.

Gerry Gustin commented about Jamie on his Facebook account this morning:

at 222 am, Trotwood Police Detective Jamie Faulkner passed away after a valiant battle with cancer. The world has lost another good one! He was a close friend, a band-mate in Knight Blaze, and one of the most kind and gentle men I ever met! He is at peace finally and has earned his great reward!


Journalists Lie About Politics?

Finding objective reporting regarding politics is a challenge

This is fairly long, but well worth the read. It’s about time at least ONE of the journalists stood up and held the profession accountable. And I’m not voting Republican or Democrat this year (I stand as a Libertarian and believe that if we keep voting the same system into office we will continue to see the same results), but I think this guy really spells out some of the issues. At least from the issue of how journalism is NOT objective.

This article first appeared in print at the Rhinoceros Times in Greenesboro, NC. I’ve also seen it featured at the Ornery American.

Would the Last Honest Reporter Please Turn On the Lights?

By Orson Scott Card

Editor’s note: Orson Scott Card is a Democrat and a newspaper columnist, and in this opinion piece he takes on both while lamenting the current state of journalism. [His website can be found at www.hatrack.com]

An open letter to the local daily paper — almost every local daily paper in America: I remember reading All the President’s Men and thinking: That’s journalism. You do what it takes to get the truth and you lay it before the public, because the public has a right to know. This housing crisis didn’t come out of nowhere. It was not a vague emanation of the evil Bush administration. It was a direct result of the political decision, back in the late 1990s, to loosen the rules of lending so that home loans would be more accessible to poor people.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were authorized to approve risky loans. What is a risky loan? It’s a loan that the recipient is likely not to be able to repay. The goal of this rule change was to help the poor — which especially would help members of minority groups. But how does it help these people to give them a loan that they can’t repay? They get into a house, yes, but when they can’t make the payments, they lose the house — along with their credit rating. They end up worse off than before. This was completely foreseeable and in fact many people did foresee it.

One political party, in Congress and in the executive branch, tried repeatedly to tighten up the rules. The other party blocked every such attempt and tried to loosen them. Furthermore, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae were making political contributions to the very members of Congress who were allowing them to make irresponsible loans. (Though why quasi-federal agencies were allowed to do so baffles me. It’s as if the Pentagon were allowed to contribute to the political campaigns of Congressmen who support increasing their budget.)

Isn’t there a story here? Doesn’t journalism require that you who produce our daily paper tell the truth about who brought us to a position where the only way to keep confidence in our economy was a $700 billion bailout? Aren’t you supposed to follow the money and see which politicians were benefiting personally from the deregulation of mortgage lending? I have no doubt that if these facts had pointed to the Republican Party or to John McCain as the guilty parties, you would be treating it as a vast scandal. “Housing-gate,” no doubt. Or “Fannie-gate.”

Instead, it was Senator Christopher Dodd and Congressman Barney Frank, both Democrats, who denied that there were any problems, who refused Bush administration requests to set up a regulatory agency to watch over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and who were still pushing for these agencies to go even further in promoting sub-prime mortgage loans almost up to the minute they failed. As Thomas Sowell points out in a TownHall.com essay entitled “Do Facts Matter?“: “Alan Greenspan warned them four years ago. So did the Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers to the President. So did Bush’s Secretary of the Treasury.”

These are facts. This financial crisis was completely preventable. The party that blocked any attempt to prevent it was… the Democratic Party. The party that tried to prevent it was… the Republican Party. Yet when Nancy Pelosi accused the Bush administration and Republican deregulation of causing the crisis, you in the press did not hold her to account for her lie. Instead, you criticized Republicans who took offense at this lie and refused to vote for the bailout! What? It’s not the liar, but the victims of the lie who are to blame?

Now let’s follow the money… right to the presidential candidate who is the number-two recipient of campaign contributions from Fannie Mae. And after Freddie Raines, the CEO of Fannie Mae who made $90 million while running it into the ground, was fired for his incompetence, one presidential candidate’s campaign actually consulted him for advice on housing. If that presidential candidate had been John McCain, you would have called it a major scandal and we would be getting stories in your paper every day about how incompetent and corrupt he was. But instead, that candidate was Barack Obama, and so you have buried this story, and when the McCain campaign dared to call Raines an “adviser” to the Obama campaign — because that campaign had sought his advice — you actually let Obama’s people get away with accusing McCain of lying, merely because Raines wasn’t listed as an official adviser to the Obama campaign. You would never tolerate such weasely nit-picking from a Republican. If you who produce our local daily paper actually had any principles, you would be pounding this story, because the prosperity of all Americans was put at risk by the foolish, short-sighted, politically selfish, and possibly corrupt actions of leading Democrats, including Obama. If you who produce our local daily paper had any personal honor, you would find it unbearable to let the American people believe that somehow Republicans were to blame for this crisis. There are precedents.

Even though President Bush and his administration never said that Iraq sponsored or was linked to 9/11, you could not stand the fact that Americans had that misapprehension — so you pounded us with the fact that there was no such link. (Along the way, you created the false impression that Bush had lied to them and said that there was a connection.) If you had any principles, then surely right now, when the American people are set to blame President Bush and John McCain for a crisis they tried to prevent, and are actually shifting to approve of Barack Obama because of a crisis he helped cause, you would be laboring at least as hard to correct that false impression.

Your job, as journalists, is to tell the truth. That’s what you claim you do, when you accept people’s money to buy or subscribe to your paper. But right now, you are consenting to or actively promoting a big fat lie — that the housing crisis should somehow be blamed on Bush, McCain, and the Republicans. You have trained the American people to blame everything bad — even bad weather — on Bush, and they are responding as you have taught them to. If you had any personal honor, each reporter and editor would be insisting on telling the truth — even if it hurts the election chances of your favorite candidate. Because that’s what honorable people do. Honest people tell the truth even when they don’t like the probable consequences. That’s what honesty means . That’s how trust is earned.

Barack Obama is just another politician, and not a very wise one. He has revealed his ignorance and naivete time after time — and you have swept it under the rug, treated it as nothing. Meanwhile, you have participated in the borking of Sarah Palin, reporting savage attacks on her for the pregnancy of her unmarried daughter — while you ignored the story of John Edwards’s own adultery for many months.

So I ask you now: Do you have any standards at all? Do you even know what honesty means? Is getting people to vote for Barack Obama so important that you will throw away everything that journalism is supposed to stand for? You might want to remember the way the National Organization of Women threw away their integrity by supporting Bill Clinton despite his well-known pattern of sexual exploitation of powerless women. Who listens to NOW anymore? We know they stand for nothing; they have no principles. That’s where you are right now. It’s not too late. You know that if the situation were reversed, and the truth would damage McCain and help Obama, you would be moving heaven and earth to get the true story out there.

If you want to redeem your honor, you will swallow hard and make a list of all the stories you would print if it were McCain who had been getting money from Fannie Mae, McCain whose campaign had consulted with its discredited former CEO, McCain who had voted against tightening its lending practices. Then you will print them, even though every one of those true stories will point the finger of blame at the reckless Democratic Party, which put our nation’s prosperity at risk so they could feel good about helping the poor, and lay a fair share of the blame at Obama’s door. You will also tell the truth about John McCain: that he tried, as a Senator, to do what it took to prevent this crisis. You will tell the truth about President Bush: that his administration tried more than once to get Congress to regulate lending in a responsible way.

This was a Congress-caused crisis, beginning during the Clinton administration, with Democrats leading the way into the crisis and blocking every effort to get out of it in a timely fashion. If you at our local daily newspaper continue to let Americans believe — and vote as if — President Bush and the Republicans caused the crisis, then you are joining in that lie. If you do not tell the truth about the Democrats — including Barack Obama — and do so with the same energy you would use if the miscreants were Republicans — then you are not journalists by any standard. You’re just the public relations machine of the Democratic Party, and it’s time you were all fired and real journalists brought in, so that we can actually have a news paper in our city.


Another Local Media Blunder

There are MORE than two!

I found this poll on the WDTN web site. This is another example of how short-sided the media is toward the elections. They continue to carry the message that there are only TWO candidates in the presidential race.

Where are the other candidates?

Where are the other candidates?

I can’t vote in this poll

I am certainly NOT undecided. I have chosen NOT to vote for either McCain or Obama, yet the selections offered do not show the actual candidates.

I just don’t understand why the media will NOT show the other legitimate candidates in their polls. I do not understand why they continue to bury the third party candidates when there are legitimate stories that can be told.

There are news stories being missed

Whether anyone agrees with Bob Barr or not, he was the only candidate that stood up against the recent bail-out issues. To me, that would stand to be significant news.

WDTN is the NBC affiliate that is currently off the air with Time-Warner cable in my market.


A Week Isn’t Enough

How are you celebrating?

I was asked several times this week what I was doing to “celebrate” fire prevention week. I replied, “nothing.” Of course, this reply often raises eyebrows and suspicions as to my professionalism. I find it exhausting to explain my philosophy each time the question is asked, but I do feel that my story needs telling.

First of all, fire prevention week is NOT a celebration. It has its roots in the Great Chicago Fire in 1871. The conflagration killed more than 300 people, left 100,000 homeless, and destroyed countless buildings and homes.* A bit more than forty years after the event President Calvin Coolidge proclaimed the first national fire prevention week, October 4-10, 1925. Since then the National Fire Protection Association has endeavored to continue the tradition.

Coolidge, with some wisdom and sympathy, had realized that more than 15,000 persons per year were dying from fires in the U.S. He called this situation “startling.” Coolidge stated,

“This waste results from the conditions which justify a sense of shame and horror; for the greater part of it could and ought to be prevented… It is highly desirable that every effort be made to reform the conditions which have made possible so vast a destruction of the national wealth”.

And, in all respects I agree absolutely with his sentiment. I don’t, however, believe that a single week should be the focus of the efforts to prevent these devastating fires.

Corporate convenience

Each October I receive more phone calls asking for fire department participation for events, tours, corporate “community days” and special events than I can possibly accommodate. Most of the requests come last minute, as people have realized that their corporation calendar shows “Fire Prevention Week.”

Sadly, I find that most of these last minute requests are [often] feeble attempts for companies and organizations to show their “community spirit.” They want to show their “neighbors” how much they care. So, obviously, the best thing to do is to invite the big red fire trucks to come to their parking lot to draw attention to their business. Perhaps to pull some people in off the street that hadn’t been there in awhile — or at all. Unfortunately, I’ve realized throughout the twenty years that there is little interest by the public to stop by for some free safety literature and a look at the truck. There are a handful of parents and kids at each of these events… and there is an attempt by the fire department personnel to provide education when possible. But overall, it is a very thin smokescreen for sales building.

And in the areas where fire departments do not have the budget or staff to provide year-round education, this is their attempt at providing “something” to help educate the public. Unfortunately, there is little that can be done (besides the obvious public relations benefit to the agency) to educate the public about safety in such a short period of time. Very few of these fire prevention week activities provide quality education that has residual and retentive benefit.

Because It’s Fire Prevention Week!

During my twenty years in the fire service, I have taught more than 8,600 children per year, more than 1,000 adults each year, and have provided more messages about fire safety than I could possibly count. I work constantly at providing enough education throughout the year to maintain the messages throughout the community. There is NO way that a week of fire prevention messages would ever enable me to accomplish this task. And there is no reason that anyone should limit their focus on preventing fires to only one week each year.

Yet, I get constant requests (a day or week before Fire Prevention Week) for the fire department to visit local daycares, preschools, companies and businesses. They think of it just before the week starts — and then get angry or disappointed that we can’t provide the service.

Keeping up with the schedule

I schedule each of my classes well in advance. The department has long maintained a policy of 30 days notice for any request. My school programs start in September — and they are typically scheduled by the end of the previous school year (in May). And, because the bulk of our tours and school programs happen in the fall, they coincidentally fall during October. This leaves little room for me to schedule additional activities.

A few years ago a local preschool became very angry with me that I would not come to their school and that I would not bring a fire engine during fire prevention week. They called me three days in advance. They explained that “we are an accredited school and should be given the same opportunity as other schools!” I agreed. I told them to follow the same procedures that the other schools followed to be added to the schedule. I told them that I would be glad to put them in the calendar if they filled out the appropriate forms and submitted them at least 30 days prior to their requested date.

They were so angry that they went to the mayor to complain. The mayor went to the fire chief and the chief to me. All for the sake of providing a fire engine for a visit to “celebrate fire prevention week.” They explained that their corporation ‘requires’ them to have the fire department visit that week. I asked, “what if the fire department is unavailable?” I wondered what happens when the fire department has an emergency and has to divert their crews from the detail. Does the corporation CLOSE the affiliated school? Highly unlikely.

Take precautions and check your safety regularly

I don’t agree with Fire Prevention Week as a concept, but do understand why it exists. I think we have failed to realize the real focus of the message, though. Instead of thinking about fire safety as a grandiose catch-phrase each October, we should be planning and practicing our fire safety skills throughout the year.

When is the last time that you and your family actually PRACTICED a home fire drill? Have you gone through the motions? Are you one of the people that uses excuses to justify the lack of practice? Believe me I have heard them all over the last twenty years:

  • It’s not going to happen to us
  • We’re too busy
  • We already know what to do
  • It’s a waste of time
  • That’s what insurance is for
  • How hard can it be?

And many, many more. I can easily give you the responses to these excuses, but I’ll save that for another writing. Let’s just put it this way… “Just because you think you know what to do doesn’t mean you can really do it.”

It has been proven that the acts of planning and actually PRACTICING home fire drills can save more lives. I encourage you to do this. Not just during fire prevention week, but at least two or three times each year. Don’t know how? Check out the easy steps available at the Home Safety Council.

Footnote

*Tragically, the worst recorded forest fire in North American history raged through Northeastern Wisconsin (Peshtigo) and Upper Michigan at the same time the fire was burning in Chicago. This fire destroyed millions of dollars worth of property and timberland, and took between 1,200 and 2,400 lives. But, because the Peshtigo fire didn’t include a legend of a cow and lantern, it seems to have faded into general obscurity.


Bailout from Hell: Message from Bob Barr campaign advisor

The sheep are bleeting

I know that I’ve spent some time recently expressing my political views. Some people ignore my views because I am a Libertarian and they don’t think “it counts.”

I’ve been very disturbed by attitudes of the ‘sheeple’ in the U.S. lately. The flock is bleeting about their woes, but they don’t seem to be able to run from the wolf. They just stand in the pasture and watch the same old things happen. And, to me, the wolf is closer and closer, yet they just stand there.

Redistributing the message

So, I continue to try to share the messages that show there are alternatives. I don’t claim to be a shepherd trying to rescue the flock; I only want to share some options for people to consider.

The message that I’m including in this post is from Russ Verney, Bob Barr‘s campaign advisor. With all that is happening in the U.S. right now, I think it NEEDs to be reposted. I received this letter in my email this morning.

Russ Verney message

Yesterday’s vote in Congress confirms to me that only Bob Barr is in touch with the American people, and both the Democrats and Republicans are following Bob’s lead!

The New York Times reports:

But a majority of the House voted along with Bob Barr, the Libertarian who said, “We need to make Wall Street take the hit for its irresponsible investment decisions. . .”

And the highly read Politico.com slams both McCain and Obama saying:

There was, however, one presidential “contender” who got on the right side of this issue: former Georgia Congressman Bob Barr. Barr called today’s bill “the bailout from hell ” and warned it would make Henry Paulson “an economic dictator, empowered to reengineer [sic] the economy as he sees fit.”

Of course, it isn’t just Bob Barr who scored major political points yesterday, it was redemption for the American people when the vote – which wasn’t even close – went against Wall Street and in favor of average Americans.

Many of Bob supporters – old and new – took a moment to show their appreciation for this initiative by making generous gifts to the campaign yesterday and today. (Perhaps you would like to join now with a gift to keep the pressure on. Thanks!)

But of course, the powerful corporate special interests, with both of Bob’s opponents backing them in the Senate, aren’t going to give up. The Bush administration continues in their efforts to scare Americans and convince them that only his bill can provide salvation for our economy.

Another vote is going to come, and it may be within the next 48 hours, or sooner.

To appease a few interests, they are likely to make some cosmetic change but the bottom line is that it will still be a bad bill — and taxpayers are going to be soaked with $700 Billion in bailout funds for Wall Street. And when a Treasury Department official was asked by Forbes.com how this amount was chosen, the response: “It’s not based on any particular data point. We just wanted to choose a really large number.”

We must not retreat in our opposition to this outrageous scheme. Today Bob is giving speeches on the campaign trail and he is drawing larger crowds, greater enthusiasm, and the media is taking notice. Just as the New York Times acknowledged, only Bob Barr’s approach to fiscal sanity will work.

I encourage you to keep up the heat. Call your Representative in Congress. If they voted the right way, thank them and encourage them to hold the line. If they voted wrong, turn up the heat and grant them a chance to change their mind.

Next, I ask you to help me fund the next stage of this important campaign. We have a radio ad ready for national distribution and plans for TV commercials as well. Your gift will help us spread the word that there is an alternative to the Bush-McCain-Obama Wall Street bailout. Any amount is a big help, but a gift of $50 or $100 goes a long way.

Thanks.

Sincerely,
Russell Verney
Campaign Manager
Bob Barr for President

P.S. – By the way, I personally believe that this is just the beginning of a very bad trend. First there was money for Bear Stearn and AIG. Then home mortgage payouts of $300 Billion and $25 Billion for the auto Industry this year (and another $25 Billion for next year). Next, $200 Billion to clean up Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and now $700 billion for big banks and Wall Street moguls. Who else will be “bailed out?” Some are suggesting that $700 Billion may just be a down payment for Wall Street. Others needing “bailouts” include local and state governments. Have you noticed how state and local bureaucrats are crying about a decline in revenue? Mark my word, they will seek bailout protection, too.

To donate by mail:

Barr 2008 Presidential Committee
P.O. Box 725007
Atlanta, GA 31139

To donate by phone:

Call 1-800-Bob-Barr


Why Less Support for 3rd Party Candidates?

Lip service

A few days ago Jack Cafferty from CNN asked “Why isn’t there more support for third party candidates?” I was traveling at the time and unable to get my mobile phone to connect to his blog. I had a few comments to make. Unfortunately, the comments are now closed for that post. But many people there shared my opinions.

Scared to vote their own minds

I feel that some people are “scared” to vote outside the bipartisan circus. They think their “vote won’t count” or that it will “only boost the wrong candidate by taking away votes from the right.” Ridiculous. Remember, a vote for a candidate is a vote for THAT candidate. It doesn’t take away votes from one candidate or another. It takes away votes from EVERY other candidate.

If enough of the people that “claim” that they are tired of the current system would actually step up and do something about it we’d see change. But I know a large number of people that say “I believe in the libertarian view” or “I believe in an independent system as opposed to the bipartisan system.” And these are the same people that end up saying “I went ahead and voted for the republican” or “I broke down and voted for the democrat” because “that’s what it seemed like everyone else was doing.” Again, I say RIDICULOUS.

Media perpetuates the zoo parties

The other problem that I see is that the third parties are simply not given ANY attention from main-stream [sic] media. People like Jack Cafferty ask about it, but when I watch CNN I see no further mention beyond his blog question. He instead engages in the commentary about the elephants and the donkeys with no further mention of alternative candidates.

I have more opinions, but I’m going to reserve comment for now. Instead, here is the text from a letter I received today from the Bob Barr campaign. It was sent by Barr’s campaign manager, Russ Verney.

Dear friend,

“I would not ask for your help if the circumstances were not so dire.”

No, those are not my words; those are the words of John McCain in a letter he sent to supporters thGoing for the Goldis week, despite having raised $27 million in July.

If Sen. McCain thinks his situation is dire, he would not get out of bed in the morning if he were dealing with our situation.

– We’ve raised less than $1 million
– We’re blocked from upcoming debates
– We’re polling at 6% nationally

No, John McCain could not handle our situation.

But our man, Bob Barr, isn’t slowing down and now he’s fighting mad.

This Saturday, Senators Barack Obama and John McCain will take the national stage for their first combined national event. It will take place at Saddleback Church in Orange County, California.

For the past several weeks, we have put in requests and phone calls to the church’s pastor, Rick Warren, who was quoted this week in Time Magazine as saying, “I want what’s good for everybody, not just what’s good for me. Who’s the best for the nation right now?”

Unfortunately, Pastor Rick Warren doesn’t care to know the true answer to that question as he has willingly excluded Bob Barr and other candidates from his forum on Saturday.

After weeks of negotiations and calls to Saddleback Church from leaders from every corner of the political spectrum supporting Bob Barr’s inclusion, we’ve been left out in the cold.

The only people getting into the event are Obama, McCain and those who reportedly paid $500 to $2,000 to the church to sit in the audience.

Yesterday, I reported to former Congressman Barr that we’ve exhausted every avenue. I told him, “We’ve had calls placed to Pastor Warren from very powerful leaders from the left and the right, we sent in our personal request, and placed numerous phone calls that have not been returned. You are not going to be included.

“Our only option left is to threaten to file an temporary injunction as our attorneys believe they are in violation of the law.”

Bob responded by saying, “No, don’t threaten to do that . . . Just do it.”

As you read this, our attorneys are filing an injunction against Saddleback Church to include Bob Barr in their forum this Saturday.

You are the first to hear about this.

The complaint is based upon a violation of McCain/Feingold campaign finance legislation. While we’re no fans of that legislation, we don’t write the rules, we’re just forced to play by them. In this case, we’re using McCain/Feingold to our advantage.

The reason I am disclosing so much to you is because this is just the beginning. At every way you look at it, we’re at a disadvantage.

– We are being blocked from the national stage by the media, debate commissions and now even groups like Saddleback Church.
– Both the campaign and our party have put most of its manpower and money into getting on the ballot in every state.
– And we have our hands tied behind our backs by laws like McCain Feingold that benefit the two major parties.

But none of that matters.

We have a candidate who is worth fighting for and that’s is exactly what we’re going to do.

One way or another, Bob is going to get his message of liberty out to our nation.

We now have lawsuits active in Oklahoma, West Virginia, Massachusetts and now California to challenge the obstacles thrown in our way by the two-party system.

We’re also waging media battles as Bob continues his Midwest tour in Chicago and St. Louis this weekend that will be interrupted by a trip to Orange County, California.

And we’re not slowing down.

The only way to break through the two-party strangle hold is to fight them at every opportunity.

I need your help to continue our efforts.

Our ballot access battles have left our coffers nearly dry and I need you to make a donation today.

Please make a donation right now and help us continue our efforts and fight with every step that we take until Election Day.

Please make your most generous donation today and give as much as you can up to the maximum limit of $2,300.

Thank you for your loyalty, your generosity and for your commitment to liberty.

Sincerely,

Russell Verney
Campaign Manager
Bob Barr for President

P.S. According to campaign finance law, our campaign is still in “primary election” season and donations made before the Republican Convention will be counted against the primary limit of $2,300. You can give another $2,300 for the general election. If you can, try your best to reach or get close to the $2,300 limit today or at least before the Republican Convention. If you want to know how close you are to the limit, please call us right now by dialing 1-800-Bob-Barr.

Message approved by the Bob Barr 2008 Presidential Committee

What do YOU think? Leave comments, either video or text. Your voice counts, regardless of your opinion. I wanna know.


One subway wins, one fails

It is interesting to me that the culture in an organization can change so dramatically from one location to another.

Mobile post sent by RichPalmer using Utterzreply-count Replies.  mp3


Libertarians Win Ballot Access in Ohio

Here’s a recent media release from the Libertarian Party:

Dear fellow Libertarians,

The Libertarian Party of Ohio was granted ballot access a few hours ago based on a lawsuit filed June 6, 2008. The court ordered the 8 Congressional and General Assembly candidates to be placed on the general election ballot with party affiliation.

“This is a big victory for the 1st Amendment, the liberty-minded citizens of Ohio, and the Libertarian Party,” said party chair Kevin Knedler. “We will not go away and we will be heard. We simply are citizens that want our state and our country back.”

Libertarian Party officials from across the country chimed in to congratulate the Ohio party on their victory.

“I am delighted to express my admiration for you and the Ohio LP for this tremendous achievement,” wrote Pat Dixon, chair of the Texas LP. “The Buckeye state will be a huge player in November. It will be great the next time I get back to Dayton to see LP campaign signs in people’s yards like I saw Bill Peirce signs in 2006.”

US District Court Judge Edmund Sargus granted a preliminary injunction Thursday but will hold his order for 10 days to permit the Secretary of State the right to appeal. If appealed, the case would be heard by the the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

“Thanks to all Libertarians who worked and prayed for this day,” said vice chair Jeremiah Arn. “All of us are very excited, but the biggest victory is for presidential candidate Bob Barr. We have before us the best LP presidential ticket and the best chance to make a difference!”

Because of the chance of an appeal, however, party officers requested Thursday that all remaining ballot access petitions be returned to the state headquarters immediately. This will allow for a timely filing if the petitions are necessary. To date, more than 7,500 petition signatures have been received.

Find more news at www.lpo.org or BobBarr2008.com.

Warmly,

Jeremiah Arn
vice chair


I’ve Decided to Run

Have you heard? I’ve decided to jump into the presidential race. Any frequent reader or colleague of mine knows that I’m not a fan of the bi-partisan system currently “favored” in the U.S. So, I figured it is time to put my hat in the ring. There isn’t a candidate on the ballot right now that has my total support. So, I’m in full support of myself. Why not?

I’m all about liberty and personal freedom. If you want to know more about my ideals, just ask. I’m not going to get into candidate bashing, nor am I going to spend millions (or ask for same) to get the word out. You can just tell your friends and have them tell their friends, etc. Or, if you want to run this race, get on board! You have as much right as I do.


What’s My Stance?

Talking politics

I have maintained for many years that I don’t “talk” politics. I have been very quiet publicly about my views and my engagement in political water cooler discussions has been minimal. However, this year I find myself “speaking up” more often.

Tonight I read an email from my dad. I had seen this circulating during the 2004 elections, as well, but it stirred up some thoughts. I’m going to share the email text first. I will then “state my opinion.”

The email

Father/Daughter Talk

A young woman was about to finish her first year of college. Like so many others her age, she considered herself to be a very liberal Democrat, and among other liberal ideals, was very much in favor of higher taxes to support more government programs, in other words redistribution of wealth.

She was deeply ashamed that her father was a rather staunch Republican, a feeling she openly expressed. Based on the lectures that she had participated in, and the occasional chat with a professor, she felt that her father had for years harbored an evil, selfish desire to keep what he thought should be his.

One day she was challenging her father on his opposition to higher taxes on the rich and the need for more government programs. The self-professed objectivity proclaimed by her professors had to be the truth and she indicated so to her father. He responded by asking how she was doing in school.

Taken aback, she answered rather haughtily that she had a 4.0 GPA, and let him know that it was tough to maintain, insisting that she was taking a very difficult course load and was constantly studying, which left her no time to go out and party like other people she knew. She didn’t even have time for a boyfriend, and didn’t really have many college friends because she spent all her time studying.

Her father listened and then asked, ‘How is your friend Audrey doing?’ She replied, ‘Audrey is barely getting by. All she takes are easy classes, she never studies, and she barely has a 2.0 GPA. She is so popular on campus; college for her is a blast. She’s always invited to all the parties and lots of times she doesn’t even show up for classes because she’s too hung over.’

Her father then asked his daughter,’Why don’t you go to the Dean’s office and ask him to deduct 1.0 off your GPA and give it to your friend who only has a 2.0. That way you will both have a 3.0 GPA and certainly that would be a fair and equal distribution of GPA.’

The daughter, visibly shocked by her father’s suggestion, angrily fired back, ‘That’s a crazy idea, and how would that be fair! I’ve worked really hard for my grades! I’ve invested a lot of time, and a lot of hard work! Audrey has done next to nothing toward her degree. She played while I worked my tail off!’

The father slowly smiled, winked and said gently ‘Welcome to the Republican party.’

If anyone has a better explanation of the difference between Republicans and Democrats, I’m all ears.

Rich’s stance

And then you could be like the Libertarian party (of which I am)…

Let me do my thing and let me earn my way — and get the hell out of the way. I don’t need your limitations and I don’t want your hand outs. I don’t want YOU to tell me where I can shop, what doctors I can see, what car I should drive, or how much I need to provide others. If I feel they need something — and have the means to provide it (and want to) I will.

I don’t need or want you to watch out for “my” safety by listening to my phone calls, watching my online activities, or judging my buying habits as something that might be harmful to others.

Don’t push your beliefs on me. If I want to own a gun, I will. If I don’t, I won’t. If I want to be gay, whatever. If I don’t care for it and don’t believe in it, I’ll keep my opinion to myself. If you are gay, don’t expect me to give you something extra to reward you. I won’t judge you, but I won’t help you along either. Nobody gives me a prize because I chose to have sex with my wife (or not).

Don’t tell me what religion is “right” or tell me that I shouldn’t be so religious.

For the most part… I just want you to let me be who I am and do what I can to support my family. I should have the liberty to do so.

Our founding fathers said,

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

I think it is time for people to stop their whining about “who’s going to win” and start looking at the people that don’t care if they win or not… other than to make some drastic changes to the system that we have so greatly broken. It is the RIGHT of the people to ALTER or ABOLISH faulty government. Government that becomes destructive. Haven’t the elephants and the donkeys trampled and shit upon us enough already?

“Libertarianism is unquestionably the American message because libertarianism is the only political message that empowers the American people by giving them more control over their lives and their wallets,”

says Libertarian Party spokesperson Andrew Davis.

For more about the Libertarian view, visit www.LP.org

Oh, if you couldn’t guess, I’m voting for Bob Barr/Wayne Allen Root and the Libertarian way in the coming election. Even if I have to write in my vote on my state’s illegal and unconstitutional ballot.

What do you think? I would love to hear your views and WHY they are important to you.

Cheers,
Rich


Choosing Third Party Candidates

I would title this “Choosing Libertarian Candidates” but the Utterz site, similar to most state governments in the U.S., doesn’t show Libertarian as a choice. They do give a “third party” option, though.

For those that do not know, the Libertarian Party is the third largest political party in the United States.

Here’s some more information from the Libertarian Party web site:

Millions of Americans have voted for Libertarian Party candidates in past elections throughout the country, despite the fact that many state governments place every imaginable roadblock in our path in order to keep our candidates off the ballot and deprive voters of a real choice.

Libertarians believe the answer to America’s political problems is the same commitment to freedom that earned America its greatness: a free-market economy and the abundance and prosperity it brings; a dedication to civil liberties and personal freedom that marks this country above all others; and a foreign policy of non-intervention, peace, and free trade as prescribed by America’s founders.

What began with a small group of activists in Colorado has become America’s third largest political party.

Update I incorrectly stated in my audio that Mary Ruwart is the vice-presidential running mate. The candidate chosen is actually Wayne Allen Root. See details about his selection at the LP.org web site.