<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rich&#8217;s Rant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://richpalmer.com/podcasts/2006/04/05/richs-rant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://richpalmer.com/podcasts/2006/04/05/richs-rant/</link>
	<description>Audio Gumshoe - uncovering independent, original music that deserves to be heard.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 19:41:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DocWu</title>
		<link>http://richpalmer.com/podcasts/2006/04/05/richs-rant/comment-page-1/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>DocWu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 16:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richpalmer.com/podcasts/?p=52#comment-124</guid>
		<description>Hi Rich,

Love the Lullaby for Lawyers song... how appropriate!

This really stinks. I agree with you: who would have thought the term musicast was anything but generic? It&#039;s simply a concatenation of two common words, music and cast, no different than broadcast, simulcast, podcast, or any number of other terms. 

I&#039;d say call their bluff. Why are they represented by a Canadian law firm? It would be very expensive to fight a battle in the courts over this across borders. They apparently have no viable product, no website, and noone has heard of them. They can&#039;t want to spend a lot of money to defend what they aren&#039;t using, even if they do have the rights to it. 

And it&#039;s not like you&#039;re getting rich off the use of their precious trademark - you&#039;re a podcaster after all!

I&#039;d make them ante up and do more than just send a threat letter before I gave up. Then I&#039;d change it to Miami Valley Music Podcast and thumb my nose at &#039;em!

I wonder if they are suing Yamaha over their use of the word? (Yamaha Musicast MCX-A10 Digital Audio Terminal) Or ARE they Yamaha?

Oh well, what&#039;s in a name, anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rich,</p>
<p>Love the Lullaby for Lawyers song&#8230; how appropriate!</p>
<p>This really stinks. I agree with you: who would have thought the term musicast was anything but generic? It&#8217;s simply a concatenation of two common words, music and cast, no different than broadcast, simulcast, podcast, or any number of other terms. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d say call their bluff. Why are they represented by a Canadian law firm? It would be very expensive to fight a battle in the courts over this across borders. They apparently have no viable product, no website, and noone has heard of them. They can&#8217;t want to spend a lot of money to defend what they aren&#8217;t using, even if they do have the rights to it. </p>
<p>And it&#8217;s not like you&#8217;re getting rich off the use of their precious trademark &#8211; you&#8217;re a podcaster after all!</p>
<p>I&#8217;d make them ante up and do more than just send a threat letter before I gave up. Then I&#8217;d change it to Miami Valley Music Podcast and thumb my nose at &#8216;em!</p>
<p>I wonder if they are suing Yamaha over their use of the word? (Yamaha Musicast MCX-A10 Digital Audio Terminal) Or ARE they Yamaha?</p>
<p>Oh well, what&#8217;s in a name, anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
